Skip to content

By industry · Professional services

Every contract, read againstyour own standard terms.

The client's contract goes in. The AI compares it clause by clause with your standard version, marks what was changed, what carries risk and what is missing, and writes it up on one page. What you concede is still your decision.

Below is a contract review, running. Keep scrolling.

It opens on your team's own work

Not an empty prompt box. Staff see their own: contract review, meeting notes, proposals, time. Pick one and it starts.

Give it the contract and your terms

The client's contract, your standard version, past amendments — drag them in, or point it at the matter folder you already keep.

What you concede is your call

The AI doesn't accept or reject on your behalf. It lays out the options, you choose, then it writes the summary.

One page you can review

Download it — the reply to the client is drafted and the clause log is updated.

app.sparkagent.aiAdvisory

What would you like to do?

Advisory

Contract reviewAgainst your standard termsStart
Meeting notesDecisions and follow-ups
Proposal draftFrom past engagements

Contract review

Matter folderOneDrive, Google Drive
Upload filesDrag them in
client-contract.pdf
standard-terms.docx
amendment-history.xlsx
schedules.zip
Start
Starts itselfIt begins the moment the contract email lands.

Of your 18 standard clauses, five were amended and two are absent. Liability moved from capped at fees to uncapped, and payment from 30 days to 60.

The amended clauses — how should they go?

Waiting on you

Pick more than one if you like

Ask for our standard wording backAccept and record the riskDraft a middle positionRefer to the partnerType my own
Confirm
sparkAgent is workingDone

What it did

  • 42 pages compared clause by clause
  • 5 amendments and 2 omissions marked
  • Risk positions written up the way you chose

Your file

contract-review.docxReady to download

Also written to

OutlookReply drafted
Microsoft 365Matter filed
ExcelClause log updated

It connects to what the practice already runs

  • Outlook
  • Microsoft 365
  • Excel
  • QuickBooks
  • Xero
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Google Drive
  • Google Sheets
  • WhatsApp
  • Notion
  • Airtable
  • Shopify
  • Stripe
  • Zoom
  • Dropbox
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Microsoft 365, Outlook, Excel, Google Workspace, Zoom and Dropbox all connect. Anything that doesn't, we write a connector for.

Judgement is what you bill for. Comparing clauses isn't.

A forty-page contract arrives and someone has to work through it against the standard version to find what was changed and what quietly went missing. Perhaps five clauses need real thought — but you read all forty pages to learn which five.

Finding the changes has a clear method. Deciding what to concede is professional advice. Method can be written down; advice should stay with a person, and should be spent on those five clauses.

So we write the comparison as an Action, and turn the judgement into a question.

Built already

The six Actions a professional team uses most.

Each one is written against your own standard terms, templates and billing practice. Start with one, add more once it sticks.

Contract review

Compared clause by clause with your standard terms, marking what was amended, what carries risk and what is missing, on one page.

Meeting notes

A recording or rough notes turned into decisions, owners and deadlines, with follow-ups listed separately.

Proposal draft

Drafted from your templates and past engagements of the same shape, with scope and assumptions stated.

Billing prep

Time entries sorted by matter, with unbilled and potentially contentious items listed before the invoice goes out.

Due diligence

Client documents filed against the checklist, with gaps and inconsistencies listed in one pass.

Tender prep

Requirements, deadlines and scoring criteria pulled from the tender, checked against what you already hold.

Labour cost saved

What does a year of this cost a practice?

Starting from two people on HKD 30,000 a month saving two hours a day. Change the numbers to yours.

staff
HKD
hours

Staff cost saved per year

HKD180,000

About HKD 15,000

Hours back per year
1,056 hours
Worth about
3.0 months of salary

An estimate, not a quote. What you actually save depends on the process itself.

Based on an 8-hour day and 22 working days a month. Base salary only — MPF and other employer costs are not counted, so the real figure is usually higher than this.

Hong Kong reference: the Census and Statistics Department's 2025 Annual Earnings and Hours Survey puts the median monthly wage at HK$21,200, and HK$31,500 for employees with post-secondary qualifications.

Who it fits

  • Law firms, consultancies, corporate services and company secretarial firms
  • Document-heavy work billed by time, where time is the cost
  • An established set of standard terms and proposal templates
  • Senior people spending more time comparing than deciding

Pricing

HKD 6,000and up

Depends on how many Actions, which integrations and how many people. We scope it properly before quoting.

Ask for a quote

Questions

Is the AI giving legal advice?

No. It compares and marks — which clause changed, which one is missing. The advice comes from your professionals; the summary just saves them reading forty pages to find where to give it.

How is client confidentiality handled?

One client, one deployment, one database. The material stays in your own instance, is never shared with other firms, and is never used for training.

Could it miss an important clause?

It works to the checklist you give it and reports on every item, so a reviewer can see what was checked. That makes the checklist itself the critical part, and we build it with you.

Can we start with just contract review?

Yes, and we recommend it. One Action people genuinely use every week beats ten nobody opens.

Next

Want to know which of your processes is worth doing first?

Book a free 15 minutes and we'll start with what your company needs.